Romanian journal of ophthalmology · 2025
Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness as a Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Outcome: An OCT study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Singh Divya, Singhal Somya, Kanaujiya Vikas, Ranjan Ankita, Mani Vinita Elizabeth, Paliwal Vimal Kumar, Jain Vaibhav, Aishwarya Ankita, Agarwal Rachna
Аннотация
AIM: This study aims to evaluate various optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in patients diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
METHODS: Assessment of BCVA was done using Snellen charts, and subjective refraction was done to achieve a BCVA for distance and near. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) was done with Goldman applanation tonometry. Stereoscopic fundus examination was performed using a 90D lens to assess the status of the optic nerve and retina, ruling out any ocular pathology. The patients were then subjected to OCT scanning to measure optic nerve head and macular parameters. Optical coherence tomography was performed using CIRRUS™ HD OCT (500-21822) (version 8.0.0.518) (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). The analyzed area was centered manually, and the absence of segmentation errors was confirmed for each scan.
RESULTS: RE Avg RNFL and LE Avg RNFL showed weak correlations with ALSFRS, indicated by Pearson Correlation coefficients of 0.073 and -0.026, respectively. The p-values (0.637 and 0.86) suggested that these correlations were not statistically significant. RE Avg GCL and LE Avg GCL, on the other hand, exhibited moderate positive correlations with ALSFRS scores, with correlation coefficients of 0.337 (RE) and 0.389 (LE). These correlations were statistically significant, as indicated by p-values of 0.021 and 0.006, respectively, suggesting a substantial association between GCL thickness and ALS functional outcomes.
DISCUSSION: All patients in our study were clinically diagnosed cases of ALS, as per the El Escorial criteria. Age group-wise analysis showed statistically significant thinning overall as well as quadrant-wise RNFL parameters in patients less than 50 years compared to age-matched controls, indicating that the pathological process occurring in larger motor neurons in ALS might also be happening in smaller sensory neurons of the retina, causing thinning, which was not due to age-related process. Although GCIPL thinning was occurring in our cases, though statistically not significant compared to control, the significant positive correlation observed between GCIPL and ALS functional outcome and between RNFL and GCIPL measurements highlighted the fact that though the axonal degeneration in retinal neurons might not be translating to the same extent in ganglion cells in ALS, the subtle thinning of GCIPL correlated strongly with functional disability in patients with ALS, implying better functional scores with higher values of GCIPL parameters.
CONCLUSION: In summary, GCL measurements in both eyes showed a notable relationship with ALSFRS, whereas RNFL did not appear to correlate significantly.
METHODS: Assessment of BCVA was done using Snellen charts, and subjective refraction was done to achieve a BCVA for distance and near. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) was done with Goldman applanation tonometry. Stereoscopic fundus examination was performed using a 90D lens to assess the status of the optic nerve and retina, ruling out any ocular pathology. The patients were then subjected to OCT scanning to measure optic nerve head and macular parameters. Optical coherence tomography was performed using CIRRUS™ HD OCT (500-21822) (version 8.0.0.518) (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). The analyzed area was centered manually, and the absence of segmentation errors was confirmed for each scan.
RESULTS: RE Avg RNFL and LE Avg RNFL showed weak correlations with ALSFRS, indicated by Pearson Correlation coefficients of 0.073 and -0.026, respectively. The p-values (0.637 and 0.86) suggested that these correlations were not statistically significant. RE Avg GCL and LE Avg GCL, on the other hand, exhibited moderate positive correlations with ALSFRS scores, with correlation coefficients of 0.337 (RE) and 0.389 (LE). These correlations were statistically significant, as indicated by p-values of 0.021 and 0.006, respectively, suggesting a substantial association between GCL thickness and ALS functional outcomes.
DISCUSSION: All patients in our study were clinically diagnosed cases of ALS, as per the El Escorial criteria. Age group-wise analysis showed statistically significant thinning overall as well as quadrant-wise RNFL parameters in patients less than 50 years compared to age-matched controls, indicating that the pathological process occurring in larger motor neurons in ALS might also be happening in smaller sensory neurons of the retina, causing thinning, which was not due to age-related process. Although GCIPL thinning was occurring in our cases, though statistically not significant compared to control, the significant positive correlation observed between GCIPL and ALS functional outcome and between RNFL and GCIPL measurements highlighted the fact that though the axonal degeneration in retinal neurons might not be translating to the same extent in ganglion cells in ALS, the subtle thinning of GCIPL correlated strongly with functional disability in patients with ALS, implying better functional scores with higher values of GCIPL parameters.
CONCLUSION: In summary, GCL measurements in both eyes showed a notable relationship with ALSFRS, whereas RNFL did not appear to correlate significantly.