American journal of ophthalmology · 2005
Accommodative intraocular lens tilting.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cazal Jorge, Lavin-Dapena Cosme, Marín Jesus, Vergés Carlos
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report an unusual complication of accommodative intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after clear lens extraction for hyperopia correction.
DESIGN: Observational case report.
METHOD: A 48-year-old woman underwent clear lens exchange for the correction of moderate hyperopia. A Crystalens Model AT-45 Accommodating Posterior Chamber IOL (AT-45 IOL) was implanted to allow optimal distance and near vision. At the 3-week follow-up appointment, she complained of monocular diplopia. Ocular examination showed an increased astigmatism, causing decreased visual acuity. Scheimpflug Pentacam Image and Wave Front Analysis supported the diagnosis of IOL tilting.
RESULTS: IOL repositioning was unsuccessful because of fibrosis of the haptics. It was necessary to replace AT 45 IOL with a monofocal acrylic sulcus-fixated IOL.
CONCLUSION: Control of capsular fibrosis should be a major concern, especially in this type of IOL. Accommodating IOL exchange appears to be a safe alternative to manage this complication.
DESIGN: Observational case report.
METHOD: A 48-year-old woman underwent clear lens exchange for the correction of moderate hyperopia. A Crystalens Model AT-45 Accommodating Posterior Chamber IOL (AT-45 IOL) was implanted to allow optimal distance and near vision. At the 3-week follow-up appointment, she complained of monocular diplopia. Ocular examination showed an increased astigmatism, causing decreased visual acuity. Scheimpflug Pentacam Image and Wave Front Analysis supported the diagnosis of IOL tilting.
RESULTS: IOL repositioning was unsuccessful because of fibrosis of the haptics. It was necessary to replace AT 45 IOL with a monofocal acrylic sulcus-fixated IOL.
CONCLUSION: Control of capsular fibrosis should be a major concern, especially in this type of IOL. Accommodating IOL exchange appears to be a safe alternative to manage this complication.