MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of neurology · 2025
Skin α-synuclein assays in diagnosing Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Yang, Luan Mingyue, Liu Jing, Wang Qingqing, Deng Jianwen, Wang Zhaoxia, Sun Yunchuang, Li Kai
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of skin α-synuclein (α-syn) assays, focusing on key detection techniques.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted on April 6, 2024. Bivariate mixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each group and subgroup.
RESULTS: In distinguishing Parkinson's disease (PD) from healthy controls (HCs) or non-neurodegenerative controls (NNCs), overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), with seed amplification assays (SAA) showing the highest sensitivity (0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93) compared to immunofluorescence (IF) (0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.74). For differentiating PD from multiple system atrophy (MSA), sensitivity remained high (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.83), but specificity was low (0.25, 95% CI 0.20-0.31); SAA, IF and IHC all obtained low pooled specificities (less than 0.3). Discriminating from tauopathies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.86) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.92), with immunological methods using phosphorylated α-synuclein (p-α-syn) outperforming those using non-phosphorylated α-synuclein (np-α-syn); SAA had a higher sensitivity than immunology techniques.
INTERPRETATION: Skin α-syn assays, particularly SAA and p-α-syn immunological methods, demonstrate strong potential as diagnostic tools for PD; SAA had a higher sensitivity than immunology techniques. However, distinguishing PD from other α-synucleinopathies is still challenging and variability across methods highlight the need for standardization. Further research should focus on integrating skin α-syn detection with other biomarkers to enhance diagnostic precision.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted on April 6, 2024. Bivariate mixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each group and subgroup.
RESULTS: In distinguishing Parkinson's disease (PD) from healthy controls (HCs) or non-neurodegenerative controls (NNCs), overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), with seed amplification assays (SAA) showing the highest sensitivity (0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93) compared to immunofluorescence (IF) (0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.74). For differentiating PD from multiple system atrophy (MSA), sensitivity remained high (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.83), but specificity was low (0.25, 95% CI 0.20-0.31); SAA, IF and IHC all obtained low pooled specificities (less than 0.3). Discriminating from tauopathies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.86) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.92), with immunological methods using phosphorylated α-synuclein (p-α-syn) outperforming those using non-phosphorylated α-synuclein (np-α-syn); SAA had a higher sensitivity than immunology techniques.
INTERPRETATION: Skin α-syn assays, particularly SAA and p-α-syn immunological methods, demonstrate strong potential as diagnostic tools for PD; SAA had a higher sensitivity than immunology techniques. However, distinguishing PD from other α-synucleinopathies is still challenging and variability across methods highlight the need for standardization. Further research should focus on integrating skin α-syn detection with other biomarkers to enhance diagnostic precision.