m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cardiology research · 2026

Prediction of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Angina Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.

СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kumar Sunil, Abdul Sami Abdullah, Kumar Manish, Kumari Veena, Kumar Sooraj, Shiwlani Ashish

Аннотация

Stable angina pectoris is a prevalent condition with concerning symptoms and an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Risk stratification is important in preventive care because the severity of the condition significantly impacts prognosis. With the availability of digital data such as electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical variables, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, including machine learning and deep learning, can be beneficial for risk prediction of chronic diseases, such as coronary artery disease (CAD), in patients with stable angina. At the same time, traditional approaches such as Diamond-Forrester, Framingham Risk Score, and PROCAM lag because they rely on linear and population-oriented assumptions. This systematic review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, evaluates AI models that have been developed to predict cardiovascular events in adults suffering from a stable angina condition. Out of 1,250 articles, only five research studies have been included because they predict the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients suffering from stable angina. Data modalities in these studies include longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) variables, patient-reported outcomes (Seattle Angina Questionnaire), invasive angiography indices (e.g., Gensini score), and 12-lead ECG. With area under the curve (AUC) varying from moderate (about 0.78-0.83) to excellent (> 0.95) based on outcome and data richness, AI enhances discrimination for obstructive CAD and adverse outcomes across studies. This review highlights that there are a limited number of studies on this topic and a lack of clinical validity. Also, the final set of features in model development varies highly. Hence, heterogeneity, a lack of external validation, and implementation limitations exist.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты