Ophthalmology · 1995
Patient tolerance and ocular surface staining characteristics of lissamine green versus rose bengal.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Manning F J, Wehrly S R, Foulks G N
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine patient tolerance and ocular surface staining characteristics of 1% lissamine green versus 1% rose bengal solutions in patients with dry eye and in those with normal ocular surfaces by comparison of subjective sensation and objective staining scores.
METHODS: Twelve patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and eight subjects with no ocular surface disease recorded their symptoms on a graded scale (0-5) and the duration of symptoms after instillation of one drop of 1% lissamine green and 1% rose bengal on two different occasions in different order. Lissamine green and rose bengal staining patterns were recorded on a graded scale (0-4) by one of the authors.
RESULTS: For patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca mean sensation score with lissamine green (2.42) was significantly lower (P = 0.00006) than with rose bengal (4.58). The duration of symptoms was significantly longer (P = 0.0007) after rose bengal instillation as well. For subjects with no ocular surface disease, mean sensation score with lissamine green (1.375) was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than with rose bengal (2.5). In this group, duration of symptoms also was significantly longer (P = 0.001) after rose bengal instillation. In both groups, there was no difference in objective staining scores.
CONCLUSION: Lissamine green is better tolerated than rose bengal by patients and is equally as effective as rose bengal in evaluating the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
METHODS: Twelve patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and eight subjects with no ocular surface disease recorded their symptoms on a graded scale (0-5) and the duration of symptoms after instillation of one drop of 1% lissamine green and 1% rose bengal on two different occasions in different order. Lissamine green and rose bengal staining patterns were recorded on a graded scale (0-4) by one of the authors.
RESULTS: For patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca mean sensation score with lissamine green (2.42) was significantly lower (P = 0.00006) than with rose bengal (4.58). The duration of symptoms was significantly longer (P = 0.0007) after rose bengal instillation as well. For subjects with no ocular surface disease, mean sensation score with lissamine green (1.375) was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than with rose bengal (2.5). In this group, duration of symptoms also was significantly longer (P = 0.001) after rose bengal instillation. In both groups, there was no difference in objective staining scores.
CONCLUSION: Lissamine green is better tolerated than rose bengal by patients and is equally as effective as rose bengal in evaluating the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca.