DOI 10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.07.004
Endoscopic aspects and associated factors in paradoxical vocal fold movement.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Paradoxical vocal fold movement (PVFM) is a respiratory disorder related to inadequate movement of vocal folds during inspiration or expiration. Its epidemiology and pathogenesis are unknown. The present study describes the standardization of the examination performed in our service and the main endoscopic changes found, evaluating the prevalence of PVFM in patients with suggestive symptoms and describing the association of PVFM with asthma and other diseases.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Retrospective observational study of a series of cases over a 13-year period - adult patients referred for outpatient bronchoscopy due to suspected PVFM.
RESULTS
We analyzed 1131 laryngoscopies performed on patients referred for suspicion of PVFM from May 2006 to June 2019. Of these, 368 cases were excluded from the study. A total of 255 patients (33%) had a confirmed diagnosis of PVFM, 224 women (88%). The most frequent comorbidities found were asthma (62%), rhinitis (45%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (45%), obesity (24%), and psychiatric disorders (19%). Among the endoscopic findings concomitant with the diagnosis of PVDM, we highlight posterior laryngitis (71%), diseases of the nasal septum (18%), nasal polyps (7%).
DISCUSSION: Female sex is more affected. There are several associations with other diseases, the main one being asthma, followed by rhinitis and psychiatric disorders. Obesity appears as a comorbidity in 24% of patients, as does sleep apnoea in 13%. Posterior laryngitis was the most common endoscopic finding. PVFM is an underdiagnosed disease, little known as it is a rare entity that still needs prospective studies. Exam standardization is important.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.