Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing multiple anastomotic techniques after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have performed pairwise comparisons of individual anastomotic techniques after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, there is a lack of comprehensive analyses, which simultaneously evaluate multiple techniques. This study aims to perform a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the various anastomotic methods used after TME.

METHODS

This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs which evaluated outcomes of various anastomotic techniques in patients with rectal cancer undergoing TME. The techniques assessed included immediate handsewn anastomosis, delayed Turnbull-Cutait anastomosis (TCA), double-stapling technique (DST), and transanal transection and single-stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. The primary outcome was the proportion of anastomotic leakage (AL). Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative morbidity and postoperative anorectal function.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, comprising two RCTs and 11 non-RCTs, with a combined total of 2710 patients. TTSS was associated with a lower proportion of AL as compared to both the DST group (RR: 0.43, 95% CrI: 0.21-0.87) and the immediate handsewn group (RR: 0.35, 95% CrI: 0.13-0.74). TCA was also associated with a significantly lower proportion of AL as compared to the immediate handsewn group (RR: 0.42, 95% CrI: 0.21-0.80). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding overall postoperative morbidity or anorectal function.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that TTSS may be associated with a lower risk of postoperative AL after TME for rectal cancer; however, the certainty of evidence was low, and the findings should be interpreted with caution.