Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association · 2026
Therapeutic Communication as Autobiographical Memory Scaffolding: Bridging Developmental Science and Psychiatric Nursing Practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blenis R Colin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To introduce the developmental and cross-cultural science of autobiographical memory to psychiatric nursing and argue that therapeutic communication functions as autobiographical memory scaffolding.
METHODS: This discussion article integrates three fields within the literature: elaborative reminiscing and autobiographical memory development (developmental psychology), overgeneral autobiographical memory (clinical psychology), and cultural variation in autobiographical recall (cross-cultural research). It applies the integration to psychiatric nursing assessment and intervention.
RESULTS: Nursing has not integrated autobiographical memory science into practice, assessment, or theoretical frameworks despite a robust evidence base. Therapeutic communication employs the same conversational behaviors that developmental research identifies as the mechanisms of memory scaffolding. Without a framework to distinguish clinically meaningful from culturally normative memory, the relationally oriented, temporally general narratives common among patients from collectivist backgrounds may be misread as pathology during psychiatric assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding therapeutic communication as autobiographical memory scaffolding enables psychiatric nurses to assess memory specificity as a transdiagnostic clinical marker, recognize culturally shaped recall as distinct from pathology, and intervene more deliberately to support narrative construction that is clinically functional and culturally congruent. A clinical vignette illustrates these implications. This framework transforms therapeutic communication from an intuitive relational practice into a deliberate, theoretically grounded cognitive intervention.
METHODS: This discussion article integrates three fields within the literature: elaborative reminiscing and autobiographical memory development (developmental psychology), overgeneral autobiographical memory (clinical psychology), and cultural variation in autobiographical recall (cross-cultural research). It applies the integration to psychiatric nursing assessment and intervention.
RESULTS: Nursing has not integrated autobiographical memory science into practice, assessment, or theoretical frameworks despite a robust evidence base. Therapeutic communication employs the same conversational behaviors that developmental research identifies as the mechanisms of memory scaffolding. Without a framework to distinguish clinically meaningful from culturally normative memory, the relationally oriented, temporally general narratives common among patients from collectivist backgrounds may be misread as pathology during psychiatric assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding therapeutic communication as autobiographical memory scaffolding enables psychiatric nurses to assess memory specificity as a transdiagnostic clinical marker, recognize culturally shaped recall as distinct from pathology, and intervene more deliberately to support narrative construction that is clinically functional and culturally congruent. A clinical vignette illustrates these implications. This framework transforms therapeutic communication from an intuitive relational practice into a deliberate, theoretically grounded cognitive intervention.