Translation and psychometric validation of instruments assessing healthcare professionals' digital competence and associated factors - an international multisite study.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jarva Erika, Tomietto Marco, Tam Wilson, Lee Jung Jae, Ye Fen, Mandysova Petra, Krause Martin, Kommusaar Janne, Kangasniemi Mari, Liao Xiaoyan, Cicolini Giancarlo, Comparcini Dania, Unsworth John, Vizcaya-Moreno M Flores, Jiménez-Garcia Segundo, Liu Megan, Yamakawa Miyae, Utsumi Momoe, Domeisen Benedetti Franzisca, Fringer André, Hanssen Tove Aminda, Hagen Amalie Nilsen, Stock Nele, Andersson Janicke, Gillsjö Catharina, Egger-Rainer Andrea, Paal Piret, Riklikiene Olga, Grochowska Aneta, Stefanowicz-Kocoł Anna, Ramos Rita, Macalintal Paula, Woo Brigitte Fong Yeong, Zhou Wentao, Mikkonen Kristina
Аннотация
METHODS: An international multisite instrument translation, content validity assessment and survey data collection on healthcare professionals' self-evaluated digital competence were conducted between March 2022 and September 2024. The data (n = 6440) was analysed with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to test the factorial structure of the DigiHealthCom and DigiComInf instruments measuring healthcare professionals' digital competence and educational and organisational factors associated.
FINDINGS: Scale level content validity ranged from 0.83 to 1.00 in DigiHealthCom and 0.73 to 1.00 in DigiComInf. Minor cultural adjustments were made to the items across healthcare countries. Both instruments showed high internal consistency (α = 0.95 - ω = 0.95) and the items' internal consistency varied between 0.59 and 0.86 in item-to-total correlations. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity with five factors in DigiHealthCom and two factors in DigiComInf. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed adequate model fit in the five-factor structure in DigiHealthCom and three factor structure in DigiComInf.
INTERPRETATION: The findings provide preliminary support for the reliability and factorial validity of the instruments across diverse healthcare contexts and languages. However, cross-cultural measurement invariance should be established before instrument scores are compared directly between countries.