MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.37349/etat.2026.1002379

Медицинская библиотека · Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026

Oncologic outcome and safety profile of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab vs. conventional chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer.

Miyake Makito, Nishimura Nobutaka, Oda Yuki, Shimizu Takuto, Inoue Takeshi, Anai Satoshi, Sakamoto Keichi, Matsumura Yoshiaki, Toyoshima Yuta, Ichii Daiki, Iida Kota, Iwamoto Takashi, Takamatsu Norimi, Tomioka Atsushi, Yamamoto Hiroaki, Maesaka Fumisato, Fujimoto Kiyohide, Nara Urological Research Treatment Group

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The aim of this multicenter study was to assess patient characteristics and short-term survival outcomes of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) as compared with conventional chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).

METHODS

The database included 642 patients with la/mUC diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2025 at 12 collaborating hospitals. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data, including overall and organ-specific objective tumor response according to the RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival, and duration of response, were compared among the 1L regimens. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were graded according to the CTCAE v5.0 in patients treated with 1L EVP.

RESULTS

The objective response and disease control rate were higher with 1L EVP than with chemotherapy (66% vs. 42% and 83% vs. 68%, respectively). The organ-specific response rate for liver metastatic lesions was 85%. Median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) for 1L EVP, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, and gemcitabine plus carboplatin was 14.5 months (10.5-not determined), 10.5 months (8.4-13.3), and 9.2 months (6.7-14.2), respectively. In the safety analysis set including 40 patients, all-grade TRAEs occurred in 36 (90%) patients, including grade 1-2 events in 30 (75%) and grade 3-4 toxicities in 6 (15%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs included skin toxicity (7.5%), anorexia (5.0%), anemia (5.0%), gastrointestinal disorders (2.5%), renal dysfunction (2.5%), and interstitial lung disease (2.5%). The median number of administered EV cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 5 (2-13), and 10 (4-13) in the overall, responder, and complete-response populations, respectively. EV dose modifications and interruptions were frequent in the initial 2 months but rare thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study provides real-world evidence on short-term outcomes and safety with 1L EVP, highlighting its impact on the evolving treatment landscape for la/mUC.

Для цитирования: Miyake Makito, Nishimura Nobutaka, Oda Yuki, Shimizu Takuto, Inoue Takeshi, Anai Satoshi, Sakamoto Keichi, Matsumura Yoshiaki, Toyoshima Yuta, Ichii Daiki, Iida Kota, Iwamoto Takashi, Takamatsu Norimi, Tomioka Atsushi, Yamamoto Hiroaki, Maesaka Fumisato, Fujimoto Kiyohide, Nara Urological Research Treatment Group. Oncologic outcome and safety profile of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab vs. conventional chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer.. Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy. 2026. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2026.1002379.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.