Journal of health politics, policy and law · 2026
Health Security for All? Racial Discourse in Presidential Health Speeches from Roosevelt to Biden.
СтатьяИсторическая статьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Halfmann Drew
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Racial inequality remains a central, entrenched characteristic of American health and health care, and racial discourse strongly shapes health politics and policy. Despite this, discussions of race and health are rare in a core site of health policy making-the presidency-although this varies across historical periods and political parties. This study examines the prevalence and nature of racial discourse in 90 years of presidential health speeches, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Joe Biden, addressing in particular a debate about whether racial discourse rose or fell after the civil rights era.
METHODS: The author performed quantitative content analysis and qualitative analysis of 1,359 presidential health speeches from Roosevelt to Biden.
FINDINGS: Attention to race was higher among Democrats than Republicans. It rose sharply during the civil rights era and the COVID-19 pandemic but fell during the intervening period, with most presidents discussing race and health less than same-party civil rights-era benchmarks Johnson and Nixon. Qualitative analysis shows that presidents of both parties mainly engaged in positive (though sometimes paternalistic) racial discourse, but they often combined it with universalist or technical language, perhaps meant to reduce white backlash.
CONCLUSIONS: The study speaks to debates about the prominence, nature, and causes of racial discourse in policy making and shows how presidents balance racial particularism and universalism.
METHODS: The author performed quantitative content analysis and qualitative analysis of 1,359 presidential health speeches from Roosevelt to Biden.
FINDINGS: Attention to race was higher among Democrats than Republicans. It rose sharply during the civil rights era and the COVID-19 pandemic but fell during the intervening period, with most presidents discussing race and health less than same-party civil rights-era benchmarks Johnson and Nixon. Qualitative analysis shows that presidents of both parties mainly engaged in positive (though sometimes paternalistic) racial discourse, but they often combined it with universalist or technical language, perhaps meant to reduce white backlash.
CONCLUSIONS: The study speaks to debates about the prominence, nature, and causes of racial discourse in policy making and shows how presidents balance racial particularism and universalism.