Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
Comparison of ultrasound visibility and retrieval success of two ultrasound-visible clips in targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakamoto Naomi, Matsui Hiroki, Fukuma Eisuke
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who convert to node-negative status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, the effect of preoperative ultrasound visibility of different clip types on TAD outcomes remains unclear.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven axillary node-positive breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by TAD between August 2017 and December 2024. Two ultrasound-visible clips, the UltraCor™ Twirl™ (Twirl) and HydroMARK™, were evaluated. Outcomes included ultrasound visibility, clipped node retrieval success, localization techniques, and false-negative rate (FNR).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (Twirl, n = 15; HydroMARK, n = 14). Ultrasound visibility was higher with Twirl than with HydroMARK (86.7% versus 64.3%; p = 0.330). All Twirl cases underwent combined wire and dye-guided localization, whereas HydroMARK cases used multiple localization techniques. Retrieval success reached 100% with Twirl and 78.6% with HydroMARK (p = 0.199). When clips were visible on ultrasound, retrieval rates were high for both clips at 100% for Twirl and 88.9% for HydroMARK (p = 0.850). When clips were not clearly visible, Twirl maintained 100% retrieval compared with 60.0% for HydroMARK (p = 0.895). Among patients who underwent scheduled ALND, the FNR of TAD was 0% (0/6).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasound visibility of the clip was associated with successful clip-based TAD. Twirl showed more consistent ultrasound visibility and retrieval success than HydroMARK, which suggests that Twirl may be a more reliable clip for routine clinical practice.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven axillary node-positive breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by TAD between August 2017 and December 2024. Two ultrasound-visible clips, the UltraCor™ Twirl™ (Twirl) and HydroMARK™, were evaluated. Outcomes included ultrasound visibility, clipped node retrieval success, localization techniques, and false-negative rate (FNR).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (Twirl, n = 15; HydroMARK, n = 14). Ultrasound visibility was higher with Twirl than with HydroMARK (86.7% versus 64.3%; p = 0.330). All Twirl cases underwent combined wire and dye-guided localization, whereas HydroMARK cases used multiple localization techniques. Retrieval success reached 100% with Twirl and 78.6% with HydroMARK (p = 0.199). When clips were visible on ultrasound, retrieval rates were high for both clips at 100% for Twirl and 88.9% for HydroMARK (p = 0.850). When clips were not clearly visible, Twirl maintained 100% retrieval compared with 60.0% for HydroMARK (p = 0.895). Among patients who underwent scheduled ALND, the FNR of TAD was 0% (0/6).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasound visibility of the clip was associated with successful clip-based TAD. Twirl showed more consistent ultrasound visibility and retrieval success than HydroMARK, which suggests that Twirl may be a more reliable clip for routine clinical practice.