MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40200-024-01448-w

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024

The role of fetal pancreatic islet cell transplantation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

von Tirpitz C, Klaus J, Steinkamp M, Hofbauer L C, Kratzer W, Mason R, Boehm B O, Adler G, Reinshagen M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that the development of allergic sensitization can be influenced by environmental co-factors. Studies showed that growing up on a farm can protect children against allergic sensitization. However, little is known whether this 'farming effect' can only be observed in early lifetime or whether it also plays a role in later childhood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to test whether a farming environment is negatively associated with a new occurrence of skin prick test (SPT) positivity in school children. As a secondary outcome we investigated whether children living on a farm lose their allergic sensitization more frequently than other children.

METHODS

In a longitudinal design, 1150 elementary school children (mean age 7.8 years, SD 0.7) were recruited from nine different areas of Austria in 1994. A questionnaire and an SPT involving seven common aero-allergens were performed at study entry and at follow-up 3 years later.

RESULTS

A total of 844 children, who underwent two SPTs, were included in the analyses; 15.1% of their families reported working on a farm. Adjusting for potential confounders (parental education, number of siblings, sex, family history of allergy), parental farming was inversely related to the prevalence and new occurrence of SPT positivity [no farming 12.2%, part-time farming 6%, full-time farming 2.2% incidence; odds ratio (OR) farming vs. non-farming 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.98]. Furthermore, children living in a farming environment were more likely to lose their SPT positivity during follow-up (no farming 14.6%, part-time farming 50%, full-time farming 60% loss of sensitization; OR farming vs. non-farming 8.06; 95% CI 2.05-31.75). No difference in the pattern of sensitization to specific allergens could be observed between farming and non-farming children.

CONCLUSION

A farming environment has a strong negative effect on the development of allergic sensitization. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that atopic children living on a farm lose their SPT positivity more frequently than children from non-farming environments.

Для цитирования: von Tirpitz C, Klaus J, Steinkamp M, Hofbauer L C, Kratzer W, Mason R, Boehm B O, Adler G, Reinshagen M. The role of fetal pancreatic islet cell transplantation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-024-01448-w.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.