Frontiers in public health · 2026
Preemptive rapid antigen test as an emergency measure during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreaks.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pan Yaping, Liu Yong, Jiang Ye, Cai Jin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We acknowledge that the rapid antigen test (RAT) has several advantages, including faster results, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for on-site self-testing. However, there is still controversy regarding the performance of the RAT for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to evaluate RAT screening in a COVID-19 outbreak situation.
METHODS: In this study, we developed a preemptive testing model in which a RAT was immediately followed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) during a single screening in a high-density community outbreak to rapidly prevent transmission. The RAT and RT-PCR were performed using the Flowflex™ SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Kit and the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Test Kit, respectively. Furthermore, we retrospectively investigated diagnostic data from a total of 813 participants. Then, we analyzed sensitivity and specificity using RT-PCR as the reference method. In addition, we compared our data with those from another published study involving serial screening using the chi-squared test, in which 541 samples were analyzed.
RESULTS: Our study showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the RAT were 0.82 and 1.00, respectively. We found a slightly higher false-negative rate, corresponding to decreased sensitivity, in our data compared to the previous study; however, the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the false-positive rate, corresponding to specificity, between the two studies.
CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that a RAT with a single screening does not pose an additional risk of inaccurate diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to serial screening. The strategy of a preemptive RAT might be an effective emergency measure to prevent COVID-19 transmission at an early stage of an outbreak.
METHODS: In this study, we developed a preemptive testing model in which a RAT was immediately followed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) during a single screening in a high-density community outbreak to rapidly prevent transmission. The RAT and RT-PCR were performed using the Flowflex™ SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Kit and the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Test Kit, respectively. Furthermore, we retrospectively investigated diagnostic data from a total of 813 participants. Then, we analyzed sensitivity and specificity using RT-PCR as the reference method. In addition, we compared our data with those from another published study involving serial screening using the chi-squared test, in which 541 samples were analyzed.
RESULTS: Our study showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the RAT were 0.82 and 1.00, respectively. We found a slightly higher false-negative rate, corresponding to decreased sensitivity, in our data compared to the previous study; however, the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the false-positive rate, corresponding to specificity, between the two studies.
CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that a RAT with a single screening does not pose an additional risk of inaccurate diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to serial screening. The strategy of a preemptive RAT might be an effective emergency measure to prevent COVID-19 transmission at an early stage of an outbreak.