MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/europace/euag256

Медицинская библиотека · Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026

Yield of Atrial Fibrillation Screening according to Methodology and Patient Characteristics: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of 34,165 Individuals Screened for Atrial Fibrillation within the AFFECT-EU/AF-SCREEN Collaboration.

Xing Lucas Y, McIntyre William F, Engdahl Johan, Zink Matthias Daniel, Marx Nikolaus Albert Helmut, Svennberg Emma, Gudmundsdottir Katrin Kemp, Himmelreich Jelle C L, Boriani Giuseppe, Mei Davide Antonio, Engler Daniel, Steinhubl Steven R, Haeusler Karl Georg, Endres Matthias, Montaner Joan, Freedman Ben, Schnabel Renate B, Healey Jeff S, Svendsen Jesper Hastrup, Diederichsen Søren Zöga

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening may reduce adverse outcomes through early initiation of preventive treatment. However, more data are warranted to inform the yield of different screening strategies. This study aimed to evaluate how patient characteristics and screening methodologies influence screening yield.

METHODS

We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of 12 European and North American study cohorts, by using generalized linear mixed models with random intercept at study level.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis of 34,165 participants screened for AF (age 73.4 ± 7.5 years and 53.5% female), the screening yield increased with more intensive approaches, ranging from 0.83% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-2.87] in single-timepoint screening, to 5.06% [95% CI: 3.55-7.17] in intermittent (i.e. repeated single-timepoint) screening, 4.81% [95% CI: 3.79-6.08] in short-term continuous monitoring (≤30 days), and up to 30.39% [95% CI: 28.06-32.84] in long-term continuous monitoring (>30 days). Advanced age, male sex, hypertension, and heart failure (HF) were associated with detection. Significant interactions were observed between screening approach and age, sex, HF, CHADS2, and NT-proBNP. These risk factors had a stronger influence on AF detection with single-timepoint screening, compared with more intensive methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, AF screening yield varied substantially by patient characteristics and screening approach. Advanced age, male sex, and HF were independently associated with greater AF detection, particularly in those having single-timepoint screening. Our findings support tailoring the screening approach to the individual target population in clinical practice. Further studies to assess clinical outcomes following screening are needed and underway.

Для цитирования: Xing Lucas Y, McIntyre William F, Engdahl Johan, Zink Matthias Daniel, Marx Nikolaus Albert Helmut, Svennberg Emma, Gudmundsdottir Katrin Kemp, Himmelreich Jelle C L, Boriani Giuseppe, Mei Davide Antonio, Engler Daniel, Steinhubl Steven R, Haeusler Karl Georg, Endres Matthias, Montaner Joan, Freedman Ben, Schnabel Renate B, Healey Jeff S, Svendsen Jesper Hastrup, Diederichsen Søren Zöga. Yield of Atrial Fibrillation Screening according to Methodology and Patient Characteristics: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of 34,165 Individuals Screened for Atrial Fibrillation within the AFFECT-EU/AF-SCREEN Collaboration.. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euag256.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.