MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/clt2.12269

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and translational allergy · 2023

Comparative short-term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta-analysis.

Chen Jiani, Wang Huan, Zhang Chen, Shi Le, Zhang Qianqian, Song Xiaole, Wang Dehui, Hu Li, Yu Hongmeng, Sun Xicai

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials.

METHODS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers according to the PRISMA recommendations and any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator. Outcomes were measured through a random-effects model. We searched Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and other relevant sources from its inception to April 30, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or biologics in treating adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Studies involving other miscellaneous diseases, non-RCT design, and insufficient participants or follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, five RCTs and 1748 patients were included. All the biologics, as well as ESS, could significantly improve key nasal outcomes in CRSwNP both at 6 months and 1 year. Dupilumab exhibited better efficacy than ESS in improving SNOT-22 scores at one year. However, ESS showed superiority over three biologics in improving nasal congestion scores (NCS) at two various time points, except for better efficacy of Dupilumab at 1 year. For the loss of smell scores, a greater improvement was observed in the Dupilumab cohort compared with other biologics and even ESS counterparts. Safety analysis showed no significant difference between the ESS cohort and biologic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, ESS showed comparable improvement in quality of life and symptoms to Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab. Dupilumab seems to be more effective than ESS in selected items, whereas head-to-head trials and real-world studies are urgent to compare their efficacy. Our findings also showed that biologics could be applied as alternative or adjuvant therapy for uncontrolled severe CRSwNP.

Для цитирования: Chen Jiani, Wang Huan, Zhang Chen, Shi Le, Zhang Qianqian, Song Xiaole, Wang Dehui, Hu Li, Yu Hongmeng, Sun Xicai. Comparative short-term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta-analysis.. Clinical and translational allergy. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12269.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.