The American journal of cardiology · 1977
Ventriculographic and hemodynamic features of mitral regurgitation of cardiomyopathic, rheumatic and nonrheumatic etiology.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bolen J L, Alderman E L
Аннотация
Quantitative angiographic findings were reviewed in 40 patients with significant mitral regurgitation classified into three etiologic groups: group I, primary mitral regurgitation (prolapse, ruptured chordae); group II, mixed stenosis and regurgitation of rheumatic origin; and group III, cardiomyopathic mitral regurgitation. For patients in both groups I and II, left ventricular end-diastolic volume was directly related to regurgitant fraction, and ejection fraction was generally well maintained. In contrast, patients in group III had a depressed ejection fraction (less than 0.40) and end-diastolic volume that was disproportionately increased in relation to the degree of regurgitation. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was a poor indicator of severity of regurgitation in all patient groups. There was a significant negative correlation between forward cardiac index and regurgitant fraction. There was significant relation, although with considerable variation, between the normalized V wave and regurgitant fraction. The graphs of chamber size, ejection fraction and hemodynamic measures plotted against the severity of regurgitation in different patient groups provide a perspective for interpreting the findings in individual patients.