MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.125

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2020

Reconstruction of a large abdominal wall defect without using mesh: A case report.

Rongviriyapanich Apinan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall supplemented by surgery of the abdominal wall infection or the excision of the abdominal wall tumor is one of the most difficult procedures due to the need to avoid incisional hernia and to minimize the spread of infection. The primary purpose of the repair of the abdominal wall is to safeguard the visceral organs and avoid postoperative incisional hernia. Many of the abdominal wall restoration procedures include simple sutures of rectus abdominis aponeurosis, component separation procedure, and open mesh repair. Mesh restoration is currently the gold standard in elective care for most instances of abdominal wall reconstruction.

PRESENTATION OF CASE: A male patient aged 69 years had cutaneous mucormycosis. We agreed to perform a wide excision of the lesion. There was a large abdominal wall defect after the excision. Due to concerns about mesh repair due to contaminated surgical area and loss of skin shielding, we opted to use Nylon Darn for abdominal closure.

DISCUSSION: We documented our technique for abdominal wall reconstruction using adapted Nylon darn.

CONCLUSION

For closing abdominal wall defects in surgical areas with elevated infection rates, the newly-designed technique proposed in this paper could be an alternative approach.

Для цитирования: Rongviriyapanich Apinan. Reconstruction of a large abdominal wall defect without using mesh: A case report.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.125.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.