DOI 10.1007/s00270-025-04247-9
Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Lesions Near or Involving Gastrointestinal Structures.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and local efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for soft tissue lesions near or involving gastrointestinal structures.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients treated with percutaneous IRE for lesions near or involving gastrointestinal structures from June 2018 to March 2024. Safety was assessed by complications graded according to CTCAE criteria. Efficacy, a secondary outcome, was evaluated based on tumor response and local progression-free survival (LPFS) using mRECIST and PERCIST criteria. Additional secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay.
RESULTS
Twenty-five patients underwent IRE for 30 lesions near the stomach, small bowel, colon, or rectum. Primary cancers included pancreatic (n = 1), uterine (n = 1), urothelial (n = 2), prostate (n = 2), small intestine (n = 3), renal cell (n = 4) and colorectal (n = 12). Median age was 65 years, mean lesion size 2.4 cm, and technical success 100%. Complications occurred in 34.8% (all grade 1), with no gastrointestinal perforations. Median hospital stay was 1 night. Median follow-up was 25.3 months; LPFS was 24.4 months, with 1- and 2 year rates of 62.0% and 54.3%. In the colorectal cancer subgroup, LPFS was 23.8 months, with 1- and 2 year rates of 58.7% and 47.0%, and median OS 56.1 months (1 year: 100%, 2 year: 87.5%).
CONCLUSION
IRE is found to be safe and an effective local treatment for soft tissue metastases near the gastrointestinal tract, offering promising control with minimal complications in challenging anatomical locations. Level of Evidence 4 (retrospective study without a control group).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.