Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2025
A Comparitive Study Between Early Outcomes of Laser and Lay-Open Technique in Management of Simple Pilonidal Sinus.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Deen Mostafa Seif, Hassan Youssef Mohamed, Sorour Magdy Akel, El Hadad Hany, Wael Mohamed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus (PS) predominantly impacts adolescent and young adult males. This condition may be asymptomatically or escalate to painful acute abscesses and recurrent discharge.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laser therapy compared to the lay-open technique in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
METHODS: Prospective randomized comparative study including 40 patients, divided into two equal groups: (a) The SiLaT group: PS treated with diode laser therapy (SiLaT) and (b) the lay-open group: PS treated with lay-open (sinotomy). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, pain scores, healing time, complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: Operative time was significantly shorter in the SiLaT group (18.4 ± 2.1 min vs. 26.2 ± 3.7 min, p = 0.022). Hospital stay was shorter in the SiLaT group (6.60 ± 1.47 h vs. 15.10 ± 5.52 h, p < 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the SiLaT group (2.30 ± 0.92 vs. 4.80 ± 1.01, p < 0.001). Wound healing was significantly faster in the SiLaT group (10.1 ± 2.7 days vs. 34.1 ± 15.1 days, p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates (p = 0.998) and surgical site infection (p = 1.00) were comparable among both groups.
CONCLUSION: Sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) demonstrated superior early outcomes, including faster recovery, reduced pain, and fewer complications with earlier resumption of daily activities compared to the lay-open technique. However, recurrence rates remain similar, necessitating long-term studies to evaluate its effectiveness as a first-line treatment. These findings support the use of SiLaT as a day-case surgical procedure, for treating simple PS disease, particularly in young active patients seeking rapid recovery with minimal morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laser therapy compared to the lay-open technique in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
METHODS: Prospective randomized comparative study including 40 patients, divided into two equal groups: (a) The SiLaT group: PS treated with diode laser therapy (SiLaT) and (b) the lay-open group: PS treated with lay-open (sinotomy). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, pain scores, healing time, complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: Operative time was significantly shorter in the SiLaT group (18.4 ± 2.1 min vs. 26.2 ± 3.7 min, p = 0.022). Hospital stay was shorter in the SiLaT group (6.60 ± 1.47 h vs. 15.10 ± 5.52 h, p < 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the SiLaT group (2.30 ± 0.92 vs. 4.80 ± 1.01, p < 0.001). Wound healing was significantly faster in the SiLaT group (10.1 ± 2.7 days vs. 34.1 ± 15.1 days, p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates (p = 0.998) and surgical site infection (p = 1.00) were comparable among both groups.
CONCLUSION: Sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) demonstrated superior early outcomes, including faster recovery, reduced pain, and fewer complications with earlier resumption of daily activities compared to the lay-open technique. However, recurrence rates remain similar, necessitating long-term studies to evaluate its effectiveness as a first-line treatment. These findings support the use of SiLaT as a day-case surgical procedure, for treating simple PS disease, particularly in young active patients seeking rapid recovery with minimal morbidity.