MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-07758-4

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2022

Value priorities and value conflicts in patients with mental disorders compared to a general population sample.

Arens Elisabeth A, Christoffel Muriel, Stangier Ulrich

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Personal values are considered as guiding principles for humans' attitudes and behavior, what makes them an essential component of mental health. Although these notions are widely recognized, investigations in clinical samples examining the link between values and mental health are lacking. We assessed n = 209 patients with affective disorders, neurotic disorders, reaction to severe stress, and adjustment disorders and personality disorders and compared them to a stratified random sample (n = 209) drawn from the European Social Survey. Personal values were assessed using the Portraits Value Questionnaire. Severity of psychopathology was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory and the Brief Symptom Inventory. Clinical participants showed a higher preference for the values power, achievement and tradition/conformity and a lower preference for hedonism compared to controls. Patients exhibited more incompatible value patterns than controls. Across diagnostic groups, patients with neurotic disorders reported incompatible values most frequently. Value priorities and value conflicts may have the potential to contribute to a better understanding of current and future actions and experiences in patients with mental disorders.

Для цитирования: Arens Elisabeth A, Christoffel Muriel, Stangier Ulrich. Value priorities and value conflicts in patients with mental disorders compared to a general population sample.. Scientific reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07758-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.