MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10792-019-01114-8

Медицинская библиотека · International ophthalmology · 2019

Ocular inflammation associated with relapsing polychondritis in Japanese patients: a review of 11 patients.

Tanaka Rie, Kaburaki Toshikatsu, Nakahara Hisae, Komae Keiko

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical features of patients with ocular inflammation associated with relapsing polychondritis in Japan.

METHODS

Ocular findings, systemic symptoms, and therapies were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Nine of 11 patients had scleritis (diffuse scleritis: six patients, posterior scleritis: two patients, episcleritis: one patient) and two patients had anterior uveitis. All cases were bilateral, and ten patients experienced recurrent episodes. Auricular chondritis was the most common systemic symptom. Ten patients were administered systemic steroids, and five patients were administered other immunosuppressive medications for severe systemic symptoms. At their last visit, none of the patients had decreased visual acuity that resulted from relapsing polychondritis-associated ocular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular inflammation is often bilateral and recurring. Patients with ocular inflammation must be questioned regarding systemic symptoms so that the signs of relapsing polychondritis are not overlooked. Early diagnosis and prompt, appropriate treatment are important because relapsing polychondritis is a potentially lethal disease.

Для цитирования: Tanaka Rie, Kaburaki Toshikatsu, Nakahara Hisae, Komae Keiko. Ocular inflammation associated with relapsing polychondritis in Japanese patients: a review of 11 patients.. International ophthalmology. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01114-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.