MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/bjcn.2025.0212

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of community nursing · 2026

The value of intuition in selecting debridement aids for the removal of hyperkeratosis: an introspective study.

Pagnamenta Fania, Robson Sophie, Mason Linda

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Effective leg ulcer care includes the removal of hyperkeratosis, a thick, adherent layer of dead skin. In the UK, available methods to remove hyperkeratosis include debridement pads, pre-impregnated cloths and tenotomes. However, evidence supporting their efficacy remains limited.

AIMS: This study aimed to explore how expert clinical intuition can inform a protocol to guide less-experienced nurses in selecting appropriate methods for hyperkeratosis debridement.

METHODS

Drawing on Benner's 'novice to expert' model, three highly experienced nurses observed each other's practice while debriding hyperkeratosis in leg ulcer patients. Standard of care was maintained throughout.

FINDINGS: Tenotomes were consistently the most effective, removing adherent scales efficiently. Debridement pads removed only loose debris, while pre-impregnated cloths were ineffective for stubborn scales but useful for rehydration post-tenotome use.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple protocol recommending tenotomes for hyperkeratosis removal was developed. Further research is needed to evaluate its implementation in clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The protocol offers practical guidance for selecting hyperkeratosis debridement methods and may support more consistent leg ulcer care.

Для цитирования: Pagnamenta Fania, Robson Sophie, Mason Linda. The value of intuition in selecting debridement aids for the removal of hyperkeratosis: an introspective study.. British journal of community nursing. 2026. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2025.0212.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.