International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026
Bayesian Mixed Models Approach to Exploring Resilience: Impact of Stress on Subjective Health and Affects Over Time During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schepers Markus, Schmidtmann Irene, Schäfer Sarah K, Yilmaz Simge, Baumkötter Rieke, Hartmann Alica, Petersen Julia, Hettich-Damm Nora, Wild Philipp, Zahn Daniela, Wollschläger Daniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Profound stressors such as the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the importance of understanding resilience mechanisms and approaches for quantifying them in longitudinal studies.
METHODS: We used Bayesian mixed models to analyze resilience dynamics with ordinal dependent variables: subjective physical and mental health, and fear, sadness, and anger. The models included fixed effects for individual stressors and random intercepts for participants, applied to the Gutenberg-COVID-19 cohort study.
RESULTS: There were 206,912 responses from 7386 participants (mean age 55.09 years, 51.52% women) over one year (Oct 29, 2020 - Oct 25, 2021). Social stressors, such as loss of social contacts, had stronger negative associations with health and negative affects than work-related stress. Subjective health and emotions declined during lockdowns but quickly recovered afterward.
CONCLUSION: Our longitudinal study design and mixed-model analysis highlight the role of social stress and encourage further research into protective factors like social support and positive reappraisal.
METHODS: We used Bayesian mixed models to analyze resilience dynamics with ordinal dependent variables: subjective physical and mental health, and fear, sadness, and anger. The models included fixed effects for individual stressors and random intercepts for participants, applied to the Gutenberg-COVID-19 cohort study.
RESULTS: There were 206,912 responses from 7386 participants (mean age 55.09 years, 51.52% women) over one year (Oct 29, 2020 - Oct 25, 2021). Social stressors, such as loss of social contacts, had stronger negative associations with health and negative affects than work-related stress. Subjective health and emotions declined during lockdowns but quickly recovered afterward.
CONCLUSION: Our longitudinal study design and mixed-model analysis highlight the role of social stress and encourage further research into protective factors like social support and positive reappraisal.