Comparative safety and operative efficiency of surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for mandibular condyle fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding the trade-off between facial nerve safety and surgical efficiency.

METHODS

Our systematic review and frequentist NMA analyzed studies evaluating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular condyle fractures. The primary safety outcome was transient or persistent (≥6 months) facial nerve weakness. The efficiency outcome was operative exposure time. Surgical approaches were categorized, and random-effects NMAs estimated odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Treatments were ranked using P-scores, and clustered rankings explored safety-efficiency relationships.

RESULTS

Overall, 121 studies (n = 6659 patients) were included. For facial nerve safety, endoscope-assisted (EA), preauricular transmasseteric anteroparotid (PATMA), and high submandibular (HSMA) approaches ranked highest, while the retromandibular transparotid (RMTA) approach carried a higher risk. Analyses restricted to persistent weakness yielded consistent results. For exposure time, submandibular (SM), HSMA, and retromandibular transmasseteric anteroparotid (RMTMA) approaches were most efficient. Clustered ranking analysis identified HSMA and RMTMA as achieving the best overall balance between safety and efficiency. Subgroup analyses confirmed the overall hierarchy, though evidence for high-level and intracapsular fractures remains limited.

CONCLUSIONS

HSMA and RMTMA offer an optimal compromise between safety and efficiency for extracapsular condylar fractures, while EA may minimize nerve injury risk where technical expertise allows. High-quality comparative trials - particularly for intracapsular fractures - are warranted.