MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.93861

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2012

Spontaneous intraparenchymal otogenic pneumocephalus: A case report and review of literature.

Abbati Santiago G, Torino Rafael R

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pneumocephalus is commonly associated with head and facial trauma, ear infection, or surgical interventions. Spontaneous pneumocephalus caused by a primary defect at the temporal bone level without association with pathological conditions is very rare. Few cases have been published with purely intraparenchymal involvement. We describe a rare case of spontaneous pneumocephalus arising from the mastoid cells with intraparenchymal location and present an extensive review of the existing literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 57-year-old woman presented a brief episode of sudden otalgia in her left ear that was followed by a motor aphasia. Imaging revealed a left temporal intraparenchymal pneumocephalus in a close relationship with a highly pneumatized temporal bone. Left temporal craniotomy and decompression were performed. Further subtemporal exploration confirmed a dural defect and other osseous defects in the tegmen tympani, which were both consequently closed watertight.

CONCLUSION

Although extremely rare, a spontaneous intraparenchymal pneumocephalus with mastoidal origin should be considered as a possible diagnosis in patients with suggestive otological symptoms and other non-specific neurological manifestations. Surgery is indicated to repair bone and dural defects.

Для цитирования: Abbati Santiago G, Torino Rafael R. Spontaneous intraparenchymal otogenic pneumocephalus: A case report and review of literature.. Surgical neurology international. 2012. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.93861.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.