Extended Real-World Efficacy of Faricimab in Therapy-Resistant Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 9-Month Follow-Up Results.

Background

Macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant cause of vision impairment. Many patients show suboptimal responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy, prompting the exploration of alternative treatments. Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that targets VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2. We report 9-month real-world outcomes of switching to faricimab in therapy-resistant RVO-associated ME.

Methods

In this retrospective study at a single tertiary center, patients with persistent or recurrent ME despite prior treatments (ranibizumab, aflibercept, or dexamethasone implant) were switched to faricimab. All eyes received a loading phase of four monthly faricimab injections, followed by a treat-and-extend regimen individualized per response. Key outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), the central subfield thickness (CST, μm), and the intraretinal fluid (IRF) status on optical coherence tomography, assessed from the baseline (month 0, mo0) through the loading phase (mo1-mo3) and at month 9 (mo9).

Results

Nineteen eyes (19 patients, mean age 64.8 years) were analyzed. The median BCVA improved from 0.20 to 0.00 logMAR by month 3 (p < 0.01) and was maintained at month 9. The median CST decreased from 325 μm at the baseline to 285 μm at month 3 (p < 0.01) and remained at 285 μm at month 9. IRF was present in 100% of eyes at the baseline, 26% at month 3, and 26% at month 9 (p < 0.01 for the baseline vs. month 9). Among eyes previously on anti-VEGF therapy (n = 14), the median treatment interval increased from 45.50 days at the baseline to 56.50 days at month 9 (p = 0.01; δ = 0.86). No intraocular inflammation or other adverse events were observed in this cohort over nine months.

Conclusions

In this retrospective series, switching to faricimab was associated with improvements in vision and retinal anatomy that were maintained over 9 months; injection intervals were extended in a subset of eyes. These exploratory findings warrant confirmation in larger, controlled studies to define long-term effectiveness, safety, and dosing strategies.