Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2023
Can hidradenitis suppurativa patients classify their lesions by means of a digital lesion identification scheme?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schultheis Michael, Staubach-Renz Petra, Grabbe Stephan, Hennig Katharina, Khoury Fareed, Nikolakis Georgios, Kirschner Uwe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) differs widely with respect to its clinical presentation. Literature imposes different phenotypes potentially implying different treatment modalities. The aim of this study is to develop a validated scheme that enables HS patients to identify their own lesion types.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The developed schemes for physicians and patients were implemented in a specific software. Upon patient consent, the physician used the software to document the lesions identified. Patients subsequently logged into the patient-version of the software from the convenience of their home and selected the lesions they identified on themselves. Afterwards the correlation between professionals and patients was tested.
RESULTS: For seven lesion types, correlation coefficients were statistically significant. A large/strong correlation between patients and physicians was found for the draining fistulas (0.59) and double-ended comedones (0.50). For five other lesion types, correlation was medium/moderate, namely the inflammatory nodule (0.37), abscess (0.30), accordion like-/ bridged scar (0.45), epidermal cyst (0.33) and pilonidal sinus (0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: HS-patients demonstrate high willingness to share their experiences and data. Therefore, a self-assessment scheme, as the developed LISAI, can be a valuable tool to enrich patient surveys with the identification of lesion types, for instance as a basis for phenotyping.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The developed schemes for physicians and patients were implemented in a specific software. Upon patient consent, the physician used the software to document the lesions identified. Patients subsequently logged into the patient-version of the software from the convenience of their home and selected the lesions they identified on themselves. Afterwards the correlation between professionals and patients was tested.
RESULTS: For seven lesion types, correlation coefficients were statistically significant. A large/strong correlation between patients and physicians was found for the draining fistulas (0.59) and double-ended comedones (0.50). For five other lesion types, correlation was medium/moderate, namely the inflammatory nodule (0.37), abscess (0.30), accordion like-/ bridged scar (0.45), epidermal cyst (0.33) and pilonidal sinus (0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: HS-patients demonstrate high willingness to share their experiences and data. Therefore, a self-assessment scheme, as the developed LISAI, can be a valuable tool to enrich patient surveys with the identification of lesion types, for instance as a basis for phenotyping.