Hepatology communications · 2026
The management of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI): A national survey of hepatology provider practices.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cullaro Giuseppe, Im Gene Y, Chandna Shaun, Lee Brian T, Simonetto Douglas A, Aby Elizabeth S, Izzy Manhal, Gonzalez Stevan A, Sherman Courtney B, Aron Joshua, Luther Jay, Goel Aparna, Jophlin Loretta L, Rice John, Chen Po-Hung, Asrani Sumeet, Lizaola-Mayo Blanca, Elfeki Mohamed, Wong Florence, Biggins Scott W, Garcia-Tsao Guadalupe, Singal Ashwani K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations.
RESULTS: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p=0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p=0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p=0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations.
RESULTS: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p=0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p=0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p=0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.