DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000039584
The causal effect of telomere length on the risk of malignant lymphoma: A Mendelian randomization study.
Аннотация
Telomere length (TL) has been implicated in the risk assessment of numerous cancers in observational studies. Nevertheless, the relationship between TL and malignant lymphoma remains unclear, displaying inconsistent patterns across different studies. A summary dataset for genome-wide association study of TL and malignant lymphoma was acquired from the OpenGWAS website. An extensive 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed, encompassing various methodologies such as MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, simple mode, and the primary method of inverse-variance weighting (IVW). Sensitivity evaluations were performed using the Cochran Q test, MR-Egger regression, and leave-one-out analysis. The main method IVW revealed that TL substantially increased the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; odds ratio [OR] = 2.135; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.181-3.859; P = .012). Both the IVW and weighted median methods indicated statistical associations between genetically predicted TL and other types of non-HL (OR = 1.671, 95% CI = 1.009-2.768, P = .045; OR = 2.310, 95% CI = 1.033-5.169, P = .042). However, there was no association between TL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or mature T/natural Killer-cell lymphoma, and sensitivity analysis revealed no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, indicating that the causal effect was robust. Our study shows that TL plays different roles in different types of lymphomas. A longer TL significantly increases the risk of HL and other types of non-HL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.