Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death-A Puzzle with Missing Pieces: Review of the Literature and Case Report.

Background

Mitral valve prolapse is a common valvular heart disorder, usually associated with a benign prognosis in the absence of significant mitral regurgitation. However, a subset of patients is at increased risk for complex ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Identifying these high-risk individuals remains a major clinical challenge. Case Summary: We present the case of a 71-year-old female patient with recurrent syncopal episodes, a strong family history of sudden cardiac death, and complex ventricular ectopy. Multimodality imaging revealed bileaflet mitral valve prolapse, severe mitral regurgitation, mitral annular disjunction, and the Pickelhaube sign, with no evidence of myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The patient underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair and received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Follow-up revealed significant reverse cardiac remodeling, marked reduction in arrhythmic burden, and restoration of mitral valve function. Family screening identified mitral annular disjunction in both of her daughters, who were asymptomatic and without arrhythmias. Discussion: Mitral annular disjunction has emerged as a potentially arrhythmogenic substrate, especially in patients with familial clustering, raising the possibility of a genetic predisposition. Risk stratification remains difficult, as no individual clinical, electrocardiographic, or imaging marker has demonstrated consistent predictive value. Surgical correction of mitral valve prolapse with associated mitral annular disjunction may lead to a reduction in arrhythmic risk and promote favorable structural remodeling.

Conclusions

This case-based review emphasizes the importance of advanced imaging techniques in the identification and management of high-risk mitral valve prolapse phenotypes. Early surgical intervention and close arrhythmic surveillance may improve outcomes, although further research is necessary to define risk assessment tools and explore the genetic background of arrhythmogenic mitral valve disease.