DOI 10.3390/diagnostics16121876
Multisystemic Assessment in Andersen-Tawil Syndrome: Report of Eighteen Individuals.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Andersen-Tawil Syndrome (ATS) is an ultra-rare autosomal dominant condition secondary to deleterious variants in KCNJ2 or KCNJ5 in the majority of patients. It is variably characterized by a triad of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)/ventricular arrhythmias with a prominent U-wave, episodic flaccid muscle weakness/paralysis and skeletal abnormalities. Other clinical features include distinctive facial dysmorphisms, dental anomalies, and mild learning difficulties. Limited data are available regarding the initial presenting sign or symptoms of ATS.
Methods
In this study, we include data from 18 patients across eight families. In our cohort, the main clues that led probands to genetic testing were syncope (three families), which was associated with dysmorphic features in one case; LQTS (one family); asymptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (three families); and a case incidentally identified during routine cardiac evaluations and due to short stature (one family).
Results
Following thorough investigations, a prolonged QT interval was detected in five individuals and prominent U-waves were observed in the majority of the court. Distinctive facial features were consistently present (100%) and can be suggested as a clinical tool for accelerated diagnosis. Skeletal manifestations ranged from 37.5% to 93.7% including short stature, scoliosis and finger defects. Only two patients showed periodic paralysis (PP).
Conclusions
Regarding the clinical management of ATS, we underline the importance of the multidisciplinary, personalized, and longitudinal approach, where arrhythmia may not be the leading sign but remains the most potentially critical prognostic factor.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.