Management of Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and diabetic retinopathy: Practice patterns amongst vitreoretinal surgeons of India-A VRSI survey.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present results from the Vitreo Retina Society-India (VRSI) 2024 Preference and Trends Survey, focusing on polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) management practices among Indian vitreoretinal surgeons.
METHODS
Responses to a 62-item questionnaire, distributed to all VRSI members over email via Google Forms, were collected over 6 weeks in July--August 2024. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 289 members participated in the survey. The majority of respondents preferred multimodal imaging for the diagnosis of PCV (44.68%) and aflibercept for initiation of therapy (63.12%). Respondents preferred a loading dose with a pro-re-nata regimen (46.45%) and a switch after three injections in cases of suboptimal response (57.45%), with a strong preference for switching to brolucizumab (63.93%). Pan-retinal photocoagulation was the predominantly preferred treatment modality for all cases of proliferative DR, with an increased preference for combining it with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in cases with high-risk characteristics. For centre-involving diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab biosimilars (40.79%) in a by pro re nata regimen (53.21%) were preferred. Respondents would switch to steroids (54.48%) for suboptimal response after three anti-VEGF injections (91.04%).
CONCLUSIONS
The current preferences in the management of PCV and DR among Indian vitreoretinal surgeons are reported here. The results of this survey will assist fellow practitioners in understanding contemporary real-world practices in relation to established literature and in developing appropriate guidelines.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.