Ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing degenerative mitral repair: Prevalence and impact on survival.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular arrhythmias occur in a subset of patients with mitral valve prolapse; however, their impact on postoperative survival after degenerative mitral repair is unclear.

METHODS

We compared long-term survival after degenerative mitral repair in patients presenting with and without arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (defined by degenerative mitral regurgitation and ventricular arrhythmias) in a national insurance database. Our primary outcome was survival up to 5 years; secondary outcomes were implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and ventricular arrhythmia-related readmissions. Multivariable adjustment accounted for baseline differences. Median follow-up was 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.5-6.6 years).

RESULTS

Among 20,980 patients, 1745 (8.3%) had arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse, of whom 1121 (64%) underwent surgical repair and 624 (36%) underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). The 5-year survival after surgical repair was 86% in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse compared to 81% in patients without (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.97; P = .02). The 5-year survival after TEER was 34% in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse compared to 43% in patients without (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; P < .001). Rates of ICD were higher following surgery in patients with arrhythmia (1.3% vs 0.4%; P < .01) and similar following TEER in the 2 groups (0.6% vs 0.4%; P = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse is not associated with worse survival after surgical mitral repair; however, arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse is associated with significantly worse survival after TEER. Prospective mechanistic studies are needed to elucidate the pathophysiology of and inform treatment choices in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse.