Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2015
[Evaluation of a Micro-Manipulator for Middle Ear Surgery: A Preclinical Trial].
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peschka A, Berger Th, Maier Th, Scholz M, Lüth T C, Strauß G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Microsurgical preparation is limited by geometric and mechanical constraints. In preparation for clinical use, this study investigates performance, ease of handling and precision of a novel manipulator concept for microsurgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 15 ENT experienced doctors, as well as a group of 17 medical students with low/non surgical experience participated in the study. Each of the subjects carried out 4 trials of simulated surgeries on a phantom with built-in force sensors. The task was to apply a defined force between 1.5 and 2 N using a Fisch micro perforator, 16 cm length, 0.4 mm (Storz) targeting holes with a diameter of 0.5 mm. For comparison, the Fisch micro perforator was moved manually or with the manipulator.
RESULTS: Assessing the total number of errors proved a significantly lower error number (p<0.0001) and an improvement of the accuracy of 76% with the manipulator. The time requirement for the procedure with the micro manipulator is on average 2-3 times higher than with manual control (p<0.0001). But it is notable that this time requirement significantly decreases with training (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The study shows a significant reduction in the number of errors by using a new manipulator concept compared to the non-augmented human hand in an experimental setup. We observed a significant learning effect when subjects applied the micro manipulator, resulting in reduction of the time requirement while maintaining a constant number of errors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 15 ENT experienced doctors, as well as a group of 17 medical students with low/non surgical experience participated in the study. Each of the subjects carried out 4 trials of simulated surgeries on a phantom with built-in force sensors. The task was to apply a defined force between 1.5 and 2 N using a Fisch micro perforator, 16 cm length, 0.4 mm (Storz) targeting holes with a diameter of 0.5 mm. For comparison, the Fisch micro perforator was moved manually or with the manipulator.
RESULTS: Assessing the total number of errors proved a significantly lower error number (p<0.0001) and an improvement of the accuracy of 76% with the manipulator. The time requirement for the procedure with the micro manipulator is on average 2-3 times higher than with manual control (p<0.0001). But it is notable that this time requirement significantly decreases with training (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The study shows a significant reduction in the number of errors by using a new manipulator concept compared to the non-augmented human hand in an experimental setup. We observed a significant learning effect when subjects applied the micro manipulator, resulting in reduction of the time requirement while maintaining a constant number of errors.