MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
Visual outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion: Exploring treatment strategies beyond the conventional time window.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Chi-Chun, Weng Chang-Chi, Chou Yu-Bai, Huang Yi-Ming, Hwang De-Kuang, Chen Shih-Jen, Lin Tai-Chi
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a vision-devastating emergency. However, widely-acknowledged treatment consensus is lacking and prehospital delays commonly occur. Hence, we aimed to investigate the visual outcomes of conservative treatments (CT), local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for non-arteritic CRAO (NA-CRAO) patients beyond the conventional time window.
METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 99 NA-CRAO patients followed up for over 6 months. The subjects were divided into three groups: the CT (50 patients), LIF (10 patients) and HBO group (39 patients). The primary endpoint was the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at 6 months compared to baseline. The secondary endpoint was the improvement in BCVA at 1 year and final visits.
RESULTS: No heterogeneity regarding demographics was identified. However, the HBO group had a more extended time-to-treatment period (median 6.0 days) and more advanced-stage CRAO cases (41 % stage III) than the CT (median 4.0 days, 14 % stage III) and LIF (median 0.6 days, 20 % stage III) groups. Despite this, the HBO group exhibited a significantly greater BCVA and a higher proportion of patients achieving significant vision improvement than those in the CT group at 6-, 12-month and final exams (51.3 % vs. 24.0 %, P < 0.05). The LIF appeared to improve outcomes more than CT over time without significance.
CONCLUSION: Our study provided a concurrent comparison across 3 approaches and demonstrated that HBO therapy beyond the time window remained more effective in improving vision than CT alone for NA-CRAO patients, which had not been proposed by prior studies.
METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 99 NA-CRAO patients followed up for over 6 months. The subjects were divided into three groups: the CT (50 patients), LIF (10 patients) and HBO group (39 patients). The primary endpoint was the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at 6 months compared to baseline. The secondary endpoint was the improvement in BCVA at 1 year and final visits.
RESULTS: No heterogeneity regarding demographics was identified. However, the HBO group had a more extended time-to-treatment period (median 6.0 days) and more advanced-stage CRAO cases (41 % stage III) than the CT (median 4.0 days, 14 % stage III) and LIF (median 0.6 days, 20 % stage III) groups. Despite this, the HBO group exhibited a significantly greater BCVA and a higher proportion of patients achieving significant vision improvement than those in the CT group at 6-, 12-month and final exams (51.3 % vs. 24.0 %, P < 0.05). The LIF appeared to improve outcomes more than CT over time without significance.
CONCLUSION: Our study provided a concurrent comparison across 3 approaches and demonstrated that HBO therapy beyond the time window remained more effective in improving vision than CT alone for NA-CRAO patients, which had not been proposed by prior studies.