Evaluating Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis Type III: A Scoping Review on Diagnostic and Follow-Up Approaches.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III) is a rare lysosomal storage disease with systemic complications. This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence regarding methods to diagnose and monitor MPS III.
METHODS
We searched 10 databases for English and Spanish citations published from 2017 to 2022. Our study focused on human-based research that reported methods to diagnose and monitor MPS III, including experimental, quasi-experimental, observational studies, reviews, and guidelines. We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines for screening and data extraction. Descriptive statistics and qualitative synthesis were used for analysis.
RESULTS
We included 35 eligible articles. Most studies were conducted in Europe and Central Asia (17/35, 48.6%) and constituted case reports (19/37, 51.4%). Clinical symptoms were reported in 30 articles and predominantly pertained to the nervous system (25/30, 83.3%), including intellectual disability (19/30, 63.3%), movement incoordination (17/30, 56.6%), and behavioural issues (16/30, 53.3%). Diagnostic methods (23/35, 65.7%) featured genetic testing and biochemical assays, including GAG measurement in urine. Brain MRI was the most recorded imaging study (11/20, 55.0%), while electrographic studies (10/35, 28.5%) encompassed electrocardiogram (5/10, 50%), electroencephalogram, and audiometry (3/10, 30% each). Scales and questionnaires (8/35, 22.8%) were reported, with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development being the most described (4/8, 50%).
CONCLUSION
Our study comprehensively overviews the contributions of diagnostic and monitoring methods for MPS III. Our findings can guide clinicians in providing evidence-based care for this rare disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.