DOI 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.08.011
Gallbladder perforation: A single-center experience in north India and a step-up approach for management.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Spontaneous gallbladder perforation (GBP) is an uncommon diagnosis. This study presented the experience of managing spontaneous GBP over nine years at a large, tertiary care university hospital in north India and investigated the outcomes and treatment strategies.
METHODS
A retrospective review of prospectively maintained digital database of consecutive patients was performed. All patients received medical and/or surgical treatment for spontaneous GBP in our department between January 2010 and June 2018.
RESULTS
We identified 151 patients (81 females and 70 males) with mean age of 53 years. Most common presenting features were pain (96.7%), fever (54.3%) and jaundice (31.1%). Most common cause was gallbladder stones (84.8%) followed by common bile duct stones (30.5%), xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (17.9%) and malignancy (11.9%). As per Niemeier classification, 8.6% had type 1 GBP (free perforation in peritoneal cavity), 76.2% had type 2 GBP (localized perforation) and 13.2% had type 3 GBP (cholecysto-enteric fistula). About 60% of the perforations were diagnosed preoperatively. Type 1 was more common in patients with diabetes and also had the worst prognosis. Surgery was performed in 109 patients (72.2%). Seven patients (4.6%) had a postoperative morbidity of Clavien-Dindo III or higher. There were three mortalities in patients who underwent surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
High index of suspicion is required for preoperative diagnosis of GBP, especially in types 2 and 3. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be difficult in these patients and patients may require open or partial cholecystectomy. Early diagnosis and step-up approach for the treatment of GBP is critical.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.