MedElevator
Войти в исследования Archivos de bronconeumologia · 2026
Comparison of 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm Probes in Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy: A Randomized Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhong Ren-Hai, Wu Na, Li Yi-Ding, Zhang Jing, Fu Wan-Lei, Huang Zan-Sheng, Zhang Yu, Zhang Shuo-Xin, Jiang Yun-Qiu, Yu Yuan-Yuan, Kontogianni Konstantina, Herth Felix J F, Fan Ye, Zhang Yan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that combined use of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and cryobiopsy provides a higher diagnostic yield for mediastinal lesions as compared with EBUS-TBNA alone. Currently, cryoprobes with diameters of 1.1mm and 1.7mm have been reported to be used for mediastinal cryobiopsy.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate and compare the diagnostic safety and efficacy profile the two cryoprobes in mediastinal disease. Consecutive patients with mediastinal lesions (≥1cm in the short axis) were prospectively enrolled. After four passes of needle aspiration, participants underwent mediastinal cryobiopsy with 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm cryoprobes in a randomized order. The main endpoints included procedural success rate, diagnostic yield, and safety.
RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were recruited and randomized. Both 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm probe cryobiopsies added diagnostic value to EBUS-TBNA. (94.2% vs 75.9%; p<0.001; 92.0% vs 75.9%; p<0.001; respectively). Supplementing EBUS-TBNA with either 1.1-mm or 1.7-mm probe-cryobiopsy resulted in no differences in overall diagnostic yield (94.2% vs 92.0%; p=0.48). Nevertheless, direct comparison revealed a significantly improved overall diagnostic yield with 1.1-mm cryoprobe relative to 1.7-mm cryoprobe, primarily due to technical failures associated with the latter (88.3% vs 79.6%; p=0.048). Additionally, 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm cryoprobes yielded mediastinal specimens of similar size. Both approaches were safe, with no serious adverse events reported.
CONCLUSIONS: 1.1-mm cryoprobe demonstrates better performance in transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy vs 1.7-mm cryoprobe, making it a viable adjunct to traditional needle biopsy.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate and compare the diagnostic safety and efficacy profile the two cryoprobes in mediastinal disease. Consecutive patients with mediastinal lesions (≥1cm in the short axis) were prospectively enrolled. After four passes of needle aspiration, participants underwent mediastinal cryobiopsy with 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm cryoprobes in a randomized order. The main endpoints included procedural success rate, diagnostic yield, and safety.
RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were recruited and randomized. Both 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm probe cryobiopsies added diagnostic value to EBUS-TBNA. (94.2% vs 75.9%; p<0.001; 92.0% vs 75.9%; p<0.001; respectively). Supplementing EBUS-TBNA with either 1.1-mm or 1.7-mm probe-cryobiopsy resulted in no differences in overall diagnostic yield (94.2% vs 92.0%; p=0.48). Nevertheless, direct comparison revealed a significantly improved overall diagnostic yield with 1.1-mm cryoprobe relative to 1.7-mm cryoprobe, primarily due to technical failures associated with the latter (88.3% vs 79.6%; p=0.048). Additionally, 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm cryoprobes yielded mediastinal specimens of similar size. Both approaches were safe, with no serious adverse events reported.
CONCLUSIONS: 1.1-mm cryoprobe demonstrates better performance in transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy vs 1.7-mm cryoprobe, making it a viable adjunct to traditional needle biopsy.