The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2026
24-week real world outcomes of nemolizumab in patients with prurigo nodularis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mima Yoshihito, Yamamoto Masako, Iozumi Ken
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory disease associated with immune and neural dysregulation. Although nemolizumab has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, real-world post-marketing data remain limited.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and drug survival of nemolizumab in patients with PN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients with PN treated with nemolizumab at a single center. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) and Prurigo Nodularis Investigator's Global Assessment (PN-IGA) were assessed up to Week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean PP-NRS rapidly improved from 8.1 at baseline to 1.8 at Week 8 and remained stable through Week 24 (p < 0.001). PN-IGA scores gradually improved from 3.1 to 1.4 by Week 24 (p < 0.01). At Week 24, ≥4-point PP-NRS improvement and PP-NRS 0/1 were achieved in 90.9% and 59.1% of patients, respectively, while PN-IGA 0/1 was achieved in 50.0%. Early PP-NRS improvement correlated with long-term outcomes. TEAEs occurred in 39.5%, mainly cutaneous reactions, and drug survival was significantly lower in patients with TEAEs.
CONCLUSION: Nemolizumab provided rapid and sustained itch relief with gradual lesion improvement in real-world PN. Early pruritus response may predict long-term efficacy, while adverse events affect treatment persistence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and drug survival of nemolizumab in patients with PN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients with PN treated with nemolizumab at a single center. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) and Prurigo Nodularis Investigator's Global Assessment (PN-IGA) were assessed up to Week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean PP-NRS rapidly improved from 8.1 at baseline to 1.8 at Week 8 and remained stable through Week 24 (p < 0.001). PN-IGA scores gradually improved from 3.1 to 1.4 by Week 24 (p < 0.01). At Week 24, ≥4-point PP-NRS improvement and PP-NRS 0/1 were achieved in 90.9% and 59.1% of patients, respectively, while PN-IGA 0/1 was achieved in 50.0%. Early PP-NRS improvement correlated with long-term outcomes. TEAEs occurred in 39.5%, mainly cutaneous reactions, and drug survival was significantly lower in patients with TEAEs.
CONCLUSION: Nemolizumab provided rapid and sustained itch relief with gradual lesion improvement in real-world PN. Early pruritus response may predict long-term efficacy, while adverse events affect treatment persistence.