GLP-1 Receptor Agonism Exacerbates Activity-Based Anorexia in Mice.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists reduce food intake and body weight, suggesting they should be avoided in anorexia nervosa. However, preclinical evidence that these drugs reduce activity and reward-seeking behavior raises the possibility that they might attenuate the compulsive-like hyperactivity central to ABA pathology and slow weight loss. Here, we employed a widely used rodent model of AN (activity-based anorexia, ABA) to determine whether a GLP-1R agonist would worsen or rather lessen weight loss and hyperactivity.
METHOD: Female mice that had continuous access to a running wheel and time-restricted food availability received systemic administration of a GLP-1R agonist, a GLP-1R antagonist, or vehicle once daily before food presentation (N = 10/group).
RESULTS
GLP-1R agonist treatment exacerbated ABA-associated weight loss, confirming the concern that appetite suppression would worsen outcomes and failing to support the possibility that reduced compulsive-like activity might provide benefit. This effect was driven by a further suppression of food intake, while wheel running remained unchanged. Pharmacological blockade of GLP-1R signaling had no detectable effect on any parameter monitored relative to vehicle controls.
DISCUSSION: These findings provide the first experimental evidence that GLP-1R agonism worsens outcomes in an animal model of anorexia nervosa. The lack of effect of GLP-1R antagonism suggests endogenous GLP-1 signaling does not substantially contribute to ABA pathology. Together, these data raise caution regarding the use of GLP-1R agonists in individuals vulnerable to restrictive eating as they are unlikely to reduce the motivation for excessive activity and can further reduce food intake.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.