MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cod.14595

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2024

Diagnosing contact dermatitis using machine learning: A review.

McMullen Eric, Grewal Rajan, Storm Kyle, Maazi Mahan, Butt Abu Bakar, Gupta Raghav, Maibach Howard

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) offers an opportunity in contact dermatitis (CD) research, where with full clinical picture, may support diagnosis and patch test accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarise the existing literature on how ML can be applied to CD in its entirety.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched from inception to February 7, 2024, for primary literature reporting on ML models in CD.

RESULTS

7834 articles were identified in the search, with 110 moving to full-text review, and six articles included. Two used ML to identify key biomarkers to help distinguish between allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), three used image data to distinguish between ACD and ICD, and one used clinical and demographical data to predict the risk of positive patch tests. All studies used supervision in their ML model training with a total of 49 704 patients across all data sets. There was sparse reporting of the accuracy of these models.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the available research is still limited, there is evidence to suggest that ML has potential to support diagnostic outcomes in a clinical setting. Further research on the use of ML in clinical practice is recommended.

Для цитирования: McMullen Eric, Grewal Rajan, Storm Kyle, Maazi Mahan, Butt Abu Bakar, Gupta Raghav, Maibach Howard. Diagnosing contact dermatitis using machine learning: A review.. Contact dermatitis. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14595.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.