MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0b013e3182972f1b

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2013

Developing effective health and safety training materials for workers in beryllium-using industries.

Mayer A S, Brazile W J, Erb S A, Barker E A, Miller C M, Mroz M M, Maier L A, Van Dyke M V

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Despite reduced workplace exposures, beryllium sensitization and chronic beryllium disease still occur. Effective health and safety training is needed.

METHODS

Through an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Targeted Topic Training grant and company partners, we developed a training program. Evaluation and validation included knowledge and training reaction assessments and training impact survey.

RESULTS

We describe herein the iterative, five-pronged approach: (1) needs assessment; (2) materials development; (3) pilot-testing, evaluation, and material revisions; (4) worker training; and (5) evaluation and validation. Mean posttraining test score increased 14% (82% to 96%; P < 0.005) and were unchanged at 90-day follow-up (94%; P = 0.744). In addition, 49% reported making changes in work practices.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a five-pronged training program was effective and well received and resulted in improved work practices. These materials are available on the OSHA Web site.

Для цитирования: Mayer A S, Brazile W J, Erb S A, Barker E A, Miller C M, Mroz M M, Maier L A, Van Dyke M V. Developing effective health and safety training materials for workers in beryllium-using industries.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e3182972f1b.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.