Patient-Reported Visual Function and Vision-Related Quality of Life Across Ophthalmic Diseases: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on subjective visual function that is not fully captured by conventional clinical measures. This exploratory cross-sectional study evaluated item-level responses to an original 11-item questionnaire and their association with vision-related quality of life across ophthalmic diseases.
Methods
A total of 262 participants, including patients with glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, cataract, and individuals with long-standing severe visual impairment, completed the questionnaire and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). Associations with age, disease category, and better-eye visual acuity were examined using correlation analyses, multivariable regression, and ordinal logistic models.
Results
Perceived change in vision after treatment or disease management (A6) showed the most consistent item-level associations. A6 remained associated with age after adjustment for disease category and visual acuity (β = -0.030, p < 0.001), whereas visual acuity was not associated with questionnaire domains. A6 was negatively correlated with the VFQ-25 composite score (r = -0.693, p < 0.001) and remained associated with this score in multivariable analysis (β = -0.230, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Item-level PRO responses varied across clinical backgrounds and were not adequately explained by visual acuity alone. These findings suggest that patient-perceived visual change after treatment or disease management may provide complementary information on vision-related quality of life. Further studies using validated instruments and disease-specific severity measures are needed.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.