DOI 10.1007/s10384-026-01416-2
Nationwide patterns of cataract surgery in Japan: facility-level volume and outpatient versus inpatient procedures using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB).
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cataract surgery is among the most commonly performed types of surgery in Japan, but the actual surgical volume at the healthcare facility level remains unclear. This is partly because a substantial number of cataract surgical procedures are performed in clinics, making comprehensive investigation of relevant data difficult. This study used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) to elucidate the number of surgical procedures, including outpatient procedures, performed at the facility level.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective observational study.
METHODS
Using NDB data, we determined the number of cataract surgical procedures performed at the facility level over a 9-year period (fiscal years 2016-2024). We also analyzed the proportion of procedures performed in outpatient settings.
RESULTS
Approximately 4,500 facilities performed cataract surgery each year, with the number of facilities increasing. Although variations were observed across prefectures, no systematic regional patterns emerged. In most regions, facilities typically performed 100-300 procedures per year. Many facilities operate entirely at outpatient settings, while others operate entirely at inpatient settings. Facility-level outpatient practice patterns varied substantially across procedure-volume categories. This descriptive pattern was observed across the 9-year period.
CONCLUSIONS
These nationwide facility-level data provide an important baseline for understanding cataract surgery practice in Japan. These findings may support future research and health policy discussions on cataract surgery practice across healthcare facilities.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.