Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026
Long-term usage, condition, and cultural acceptability of the BALatrine project: findings from a subsidised sanitation improvement intervention in rural Central Java, Indonesia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lowe Callum, Kelly Matthew, Amaral Salvador, Handayani Novia, Widjanarko Bagoes, Budiyono Budiyono, Kusariana Nissa, Laksono Budi, Juniawati Juniawati, Muharsono Muharsono, Sukoto Sukoto, Hadisaputro Suharyo, Wangdi Kinley, Lal Aparna, Kurscheid Johanna, Nery Susana Vaz, Soares-Magalhaes Ricardo J, Halton Kate, McCarthy James, Clements Archie C A, Stewart Donald, Gray Darren
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Much work remains to achieve the sustainable development goals for improved sanitation access for all. Subsidised sanitation interventions are often criticised due to the possibility of the infrastructure being neglected or culturally inappropriate for target communities. The BALatrine intervention is a novel approach consisting of a community-wide subsidised recipient-aided installation of an improved latrine with septic tank ('BALatrine') and education package. This study aimed to investigate the long-term usage and cultural acceptability of the BALatrine project four to six years following its implementation in a main trial.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional follow-up study in September 2022 of 88 households who received BALatrines in two villages between 2016 and 2017. Quantitative and qualitative interviews with the household head and members were conducted to understand BALatrine usage and perceptions. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate interview responses.
RESULTS: The BALatrines were still in excellent condition with 89% still functional as initially intended corresponding to 95% of participants regularly passing a bowel motion in the BALatrine. A 77% reduction in self-reported open defecation was achieved. Participants expressed concerns towards the prospect of having to empty the septic tanks. Interviews with key village stakeholders demonstrated participants desire for aid and financial difficulties in obtaining and maintaining such improved sanitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up results of the BALatrine intervention demonstrate that the BALatrine's in the two surveyed villages are overall culturally acceptable and well-maintained. The BALatrine intervention may be suitable for use in other rural areas of Indonesia and the region for improving sanitation coverage.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional follow-up study in September 2022 of 88 households who received BALatrines in two villages between 2016 and 2017. Quantitative and qualitative interviews with the household head and members were conducted to understand BALatrine usage and perceptions. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate interview responses.
RESULTS: The BALatrines were still in excellent condition with 89% still functional as initially intended corresponding to 95% of participants regularly passing a bowel motion in the BALatrine. A 77% reduction in self-reported open defecation was achieved. Participants expressed concerns towards the prospect of having to empty the septic tanks. Interviews with key village stakeholders demonstrated participants desire for aid and financial difficulties in obtaining and maintaining such improved sanitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up results of the BALatrine intervention demonstrate that the BALatrine's in the two surveyed villages are overall culturally acceptable and well-maintained. The BALatrine intervention may be suitable for use in other rural areas of Indonesia and the region for improving sanitation coverage.