Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in refractive lens exchange with trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic hyperopia, emmetropia, and myopia.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rausell Andrea Llovet, Usobiaga Julio Ortega, García Javier L Fernández, Sanz Jaime Beltrán, Navalón-Tolosa Jorge, Osuna Fernando Llovet
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare visual and refractive outcomes and visual function after bilateral refractive lens exchange (RLE) with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in myopic, hyperopic, and emmetropic eyes with presbyopia.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series.
METHODS: Charts of presbyopic patients who underwent RLE with implantation of RayOne Trifocal IOL were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at 3 months. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, and visual disturbance were assessed by patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 6788 eyes were classified into refractive groups. Mean (± standard deviation) visual acuity (logMAR) at 3 months: Group A (emmetropic), binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), 0.01 ± 0.11; monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 0.01 ± 0.03; binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, 0.08 ± 0.07; binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 66 cm, 0.12 ± 0.11; postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) (diopters (D)), -0.05 ± 0.29. Group B (myopic), binocular UDVA, 0.03 ± 0.23; monocular CDVA, 0.01 ± 0.02; binocular UNVA, 0.07 ± 0.07; binocular UIVA, 0.12 ± 0.08; SE, -0.05 ± 0.52. Group C (hyperopic), binocular UDVA, 0.00 ± 0.03; monocular CDVA, 0.01 ± 0.02; binocular UNVA, 0.08 ± 0.07; binocular UIVA, 0.21 ± 0.09; SE, -0.08 ± 0.30. PROMs showed high levels of satisfaction and spectacle independence at all distances with worse results in myopes. Night vision was worse in hyperopes.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, RayOne Trifocal provided good visual performance at all distances, resulting in excellent levels of spectacle independence and satisfaction despite the preoperative refraction.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series.
METHODS: Charts of presbyopic patients who underwent RLE with implantation of RayOne Trifocal IOL were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at 3 months. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, and visual disturbance were assessed by patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 6788 eyes were classified into refractive groups. Mean (± standard deviation) visual acuity (logMAR) at 3 months: Group A (emmetropic), binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), 0.01 ± 0.11; monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 0.01 ± 0.03; binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, 0.08 ± 0.07; binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 66 cm, 0.12 ± 0.11; postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) (diopters (D)), -0.05 ± 0.29. Group B (myopic), binocular UDVA, 0.03 ± 0.23; monocular CDVA, 0.01 ± 0.02; binocular UNVA, 0.07 ± 0.07; binocular UIVA, 0.12 ± 0.08; SE, -0.05 ± 0.52. Group C (hyperopic), binocular UDVA, 0.00 ± 0.03; monocular CDVA, 0.01 ± 0.02; binocular UNVA, 0.08 ± 0.07; binocular UIVA, 0.21 ± 0.09; SE, -0.08 ± 0.30. PROMs showed high levels of satisfaction and spectacle independence at all distances with worse results in myopes. Night vision was worse in hyperopes.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, RayOne Trifocal provided good visual performance at all distances, resulting in excellent levels of spectacle independence and satisfaction despite the preoperative refraction.