Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
Safety and Efficacy of Levamisole in Loiasis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Campillo Jérémy T, Bikita Paul, Hemilembolo Marlhand, Louya Frédéric, Missamou François, Pion Sébastien D S, Boussinesq Michel, Chesnais CédricB
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Individuals with high microfilarial densities (MFDs) of Loa loa are at risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) after ivermectin treatment. Pretreatment with drugs progressively reducing Loa MFDs below the risk threshold might help prevent these SAEs. We assessed the safety and efficacy of levamisole for this purpose.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, MFD-ascending trial was conducted in the Republic of the Congo. Participants were treated in 3 cohorts defined by pretreatment MFD and levamisole dose (cohort 1: 1.0kg and 1.5mg/kg; cohorts 2 and 3: 2.5mg/kg). Safety outcomes were occurrence of SAE and adverse event frequency during the first week. The efficacy outcomes were MFD reduction from baseline and proportions of individuals with at least 40% and 80% MFD reduction at day 2 (D2), D7, and D30.
RESULTS: The 2 lowest doses (1.0mg/kg and 1.5mg/kg) caused no SAEs but were ineffective. Compared with placebo, 2.5mg/kg levamisole caused more mild adverse events (10/85 vs. 3/85, P=.018), a higher median reduction from baseline to D2 (-12.9% vs. +15.5%, P<.001), D7 (-4.9% vs. +18.7%, P<.001), and D30 (-0.5% vs. +13.5%, P=.036) and a higher percentage of participants with >40% MFD reduction at D2 (17.5% vs. 1.2%, P<.001), D7 (11.8% vs. 6.3%, P=.269), and D30 (18.5% vs. 9.6%, P=.107).
CONCLUSIONS: A single 2.5mg/kg levamisole dose induces a promising transient reduction in Loa loa MFDs and should encourage testing different regimens.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, MFD-ascending trial was conducted in the Republic of the Congo. Participants were treated in 3 cohorts defined by pretreatment MFD and levamisole dose (cohort 1: 1.0kg and 1.5mg/kg; cohorts 2 and 3: 2.5mg/kg). Safety outcomes were occurrence of SAE and adverse event frequency during the first week. The efficacy outcomes were MFD reduction from baseline and proportions of individuals with at least 40% and 80% MFD reduction at day 2 (D2), D7, and D30.
RESULTS: The 2 lowest doses (1.0mg/kg and 1.5mg/kg) caused no SAEs but were ineffective. Compared with placebo, 2.5mg/kg levamisole caused more mild adverse events (10/85 vs. 3/85, P=.018), a higher median reduction from baseline to D2 (-12.9% vs. +15.5%, P<.001), D7 (-4.9% vs. +18.7%, P<.001), and D30 (-0.5% vs. +13.5%, P=.036) and a higher percentage of participants with >40% MFD reduction at D2 (17.5% vs. 1.2%, P<.001), D7 (11.8% vs. 6.3%, P=.269), and D30 (18.5% vs. 9.6%, P=.107).
CONCLUSIONS: A single 2.5mg/kg levamisole dose induces a promising transient reduction in Loa loa MFDs and should encourage testing different regimens.