Frontiers in surgery · 2025
Case Report: Rare case of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a 26-year-old female paraplegic patient: technical considerations and rehabilitation outcomes.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Raizah Abdullah
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in paraplegic patients are rare and pose unique challenges in treatment planning. Functional knee stability is critical for rehabilitation, especially in those regaining partial mobility.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old female with flaccid paraplegia following polytrauma developed symptomatic right knee instability. MRI (1.5 T) confirmed a complete ACL rupture. She underwent ACL reconstruction using an 8.5 mm graft combining ipsilateral hamstring and contralateral semitendinosus tendons. Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed via an anteromedial portal, with femoral suspensory fixation and tibial bioabsorbable screw. A tailored rehabilitation program incorporating neuromuscular stimulation led to progressive improvement in quadriceps strength (MRC Grade 2-4) and gait function.
CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction can be a viable option in selected paraplegic patients with partial mobility recovery when mechanical instability impedes functional progress. This case underscores the importance of individualized surgical and rehabilitation strategies in this complex population.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old female with flaccid paraplegia following polytrauma developed symptomatic right knee instability. MRI (1.5 T) confirmed a complete ACL rupture. She underwent ACL reconstruction using an 8.5 mm graft combining ipsilateral hamstring and contralateral semitendinosus tendons. Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed via an anteromedial portal, with femoral suspensory fixation and tibial bioabsorbable screw. A tailored rehabilitation program incorporating neuromuscular stimulation led to progressive improvement in quadriceps strength (MRC Grade 2-4) and gait function.
CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction can be a viable option in selected paraplegic patients with partial mobility recovery when mechanical instability impedes functional progress. This case underscores the importance of individualized surgical and rehabilitation strategies in this complex population.