Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique · 2004
[Critical review of the evaluation of the results of upper limb functional surgery in tetraplegia since 50 years].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fattal C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the methods of assessment of upper limb functional surgery in the literature.
METHODS: The literature review relating to the years 1950-2002 was carried out with three data bases: Medline, Pascal, Embase. This review also involved a thorough study of non-indexed references.
RESULTS: Although many instruments or tests are used to assess outcome after surgery, their reliability, validity and responsiveness have not been adequately proven. Methodology appears to be the major failing of the various scales used to assess these patients. The conceptual models underlying the evaluation are all too often unspecified. There is a lack of pertinence of the selected tasks for tetraplegics. There is limited documentation of the guiding framework or conceptualisation. Furthermore, the process of item selection is often unknown. Scales or instruments are also deemed to be too insensitive to document the small but meaningful functional gains made by tetraplegics after functional surgery.
CONCLUSION: To answer the need for a specific assessment tool for tetraplegics who undergo functional surgery, we have developed a national, multicenter, prospective and longitudinal study based on two concepts: the first concept is related to Life Habits that are the activities of daily living and social roles recognised by the socio-cultural context of a person according to age, sex and social and personal identity. They include activities that should be accomplished on a daily basis (nutrition, fitness, personal care, communication, mobility, etc.). Life Habits presenting a significant level of disruption can create handicap situations. The second concept is in relation with Motor Capacities that correspond to the abilities of a patient to perform basic and functional tasks regardless of contextual factors (environmental and personal factors).
METHODS: The literature review relating to the years 1950-2002 was carried out with three data bases: Medline, Pascal, Embase. This review also involved a thorough study of non-indexed references.
RESULTS: Although many instruments or tests are used to assess outcome after surgery, their reliability, validity and responsiveness have not been adequately proven. Methodology appears to be the major failing of the various scales used to assess these patients. The conceptual models underlying the evaluation are all too often unspecified. There is a lack of pertinence of the selected tasks for tetraplegics. There is limited documentation of the guiding framework or conceptualisation. Furthermore, the process of item selection is often unknown. Scales or instruments are also deemed to be too insensitive to document the small but meaningful functional gains made by tetraplegics after functional surgery.
CONCLUSION: To answer the need for a specific assessment tool for tetraplegics who undergo functional surgery, we have developed a national, multicenter, prospective and longitudinal study based on two concepts: the first concept is related to Life Habits that are the activities of daily living and social roles recognised by the socio-cultural context of a person according to age, sex and social and personal identity. They include activities that should be accomplished on a daily basis (nutrition, fitness, personal care, communication, mobility, etc.). Life Habits presenting a significant level of disruption can create handicap situations. The second concept is in relation with Motor Capacities that correspond to the abilities of a patient to perform basic and functional tasks regardless of contextual factors (environmental and personal factors).